The Monster Who Became Human

The Monster Who Became Human
Sylvia Ridley

Sylvia Ridley - Del Toro's Frankenstein as theological parable.

Guillermo del Toro’s films do not simply tell stories; they create worlds in which fairy tales and existential questions move side by side. His latest film, Frankenstein, fits within this poetic tradition, offering a meditation on creation, responsibility, and love.

Victor Frankenstein is a brilliant but restless scientist determined to defeat death and overcome human limits. He is driven by an inability to accept finitude, convinced that death, loss, and imperfection are not mysteries to be contemplated but problems to be eliminated. His science becomes a revolt against dependence—on nature, on God, on time. It is easy to recognize ourselves in him, since, as modern men living in an age of accelerating scientific discovery, we too are tempted by the same desire for control.

In a whirlpool of madness, obsession, and dismembered bodies, Victor succeeds in creating a living being. Yet immediately after this accomplishment, he experiences a collapse of meaning: “Having reached the end of the world, there was no horizon left.” Reality no longer holds any attraction for him now that his plan has been executed. He feels neither curiosity nor affection toward his creation and turns away from it.

Learning Humanity

A clear opposition emerges between Victor—self-centered and obsessed with mastering life and death—and the Creature, who behaves like a child: pure, exposed, and radically open to reality. While Victor’s humanity has been stunted by a brutal father and the early loss of a loving mother, the Creature grows in humanity by observing the simple love shared among a poor family living in a mill shed and through his friendship with an old blind man.

Humanity, the film suggests, develops through loving and nurturing relationships. The Creature begins to feel attachment and secretly cares for the family under the guise of the “Spirit of the Forest.” With the blind old man, who welcomes him without fear, he experiences friendship for the first time. Through these encounters, he learns language, love, suffering, and sacrifice.

When Victor and the Creature meet again at the end of the film, Victor is dying—ultimately proving the futility of all his attempts to defeat death. He finally tells the Creature: “I am sorry… regret consumes me… I will not be punished nor absolved.” The Creature replies: “I forgive you… rest now, father; perhaps now we can both be human.”

Del Toro’s Frankenstein thus becomes a tragedy in which the monster becomes human through love, while the creator becomes monstrous through his refusal of love, mercy, and absolution.

Elisabeth and the Possibility of a Soul

Elisabeth, the fiancée of Victor’s brother William, had previously lived in a convent. Amid the chaos generated by Victor’s obsession, she represents a grounding presence, marked by clear judgment and moral clarity. She is pro-reality: she understands limits, attends to consequences, and grounds her judgments in care. She functions almost as an angelic presence, never corrupted by proximity to horror.

At one point, William asks Victor whether he ever wondered which part of the human body he used to assemble the Creature might hold the soul. Victor admits that he never did. Elisabeth, however, immediately recognizes something transcendent in the Creature: “What if, unrestrained by sin, our Creator’s breath came into his wounded flesh directly?”

The three positions stand in stark contrast: Victor’s denial of the soul, William’s doubt, and Elisabeth’s recognition.

Having just left the convent, Elisabeth is also the one who pronounces the key sentence: “Choice is the seat of the soul.” When the Creature chooses to forgive Victor, there can be no further doubt about his humanity.

The Blind Man

The Creature is profoundly transformed by his friendship with the old blind man, the first person to treat him with kindness. The man asks him, “Are you in pain?… Are you lonely?”—but also makes him feel needed: “Will you sit with me?… Will you read to me?” Finally, he offers him belonging: “Stay with me, make this your home, and I your friend.”

This encounter ignites the Creature’s desires and deepens his humanity, opening in him the fundamental question of identity: “I want to know who I am… I was nothing… Not of the same nature as man… A monster.” Yet the blind man understands that the way the Creature came into being does not have the final word on his destiny. What we are, he suggests, is shaped by continuous choices, relationships, and belonging. He therefore responds: “You are a good man, and you are my friend.”

Victor gave the Creature life; the blind man and his family teach him what life is for.

“And thus the heart will break, yet brokenly live on”

This line from Byron appears at the end of the film, just before the closing credits. The Creature is leaving after Victor tells him to “go and live.” When the heart is broken, the film suggests, there is space for mercy, love, and grace to enter. A broken heart reveals our true humanity, with all its questions and desires.

The film ultimately suggests that humanity does not arise from origin, power, or achievement, but from choices and openness to life’s questions. Victor reaches the limits of the world and finds no horizon because his project ends where control ends. The Creature, by contrast, becomes human by accepting loss, forgiving his creator, and remaining open to reality even after being wounded by it.

In this sense, Frankenstein does not end with redemption or judgment, but with continuance. The Creature departs not as a monster nor as a savior, but as a being who has learned that life is not justified by how it begins, but by how it is brokenly lived.

Previous
Previous

Need, Data, Desire

Next
Next

Pluribus: The Resistance of the “I”